We all use social media differently. Personally, I rarely use to read Twitter, unless I'm using search. I'm a or sometimes kind of guy.
I got to see the in action yesterday. It's shiny and new, and admittedly kind of sexy. If there's a photo or video in a link, it will load in the right sidebar. Same with threaded conversations (though, oddly, not hashtags or trends).
That's awesome.
Will I use it? Probably not.
I keep my following list very low, in the 200 people range. But that's still too many people to entirely keep up with. And that's why I prefer to use an application that allows me to set up lists in columns across the page; I can see my mentions and tweets from people in three lists that are important to me spread across my window, which allows me to concentrate on those people.
There are others I follow whose tweets I don't necessarily want in my timeline during my work day. They're not people who I'm likely to go to lunch with today, or who are sharing information I find crucial to my job. They're people I like (or I wouldn't be following them), but viewing them in my stream would destroy the productivity of Twitter for me.
And that's why the new Twitter, while sexy, isn't enough for me. I can't put those people on hold for part of the time and catch up with them later.
What do you think?
September 17th, 2010 at 09:42
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Toddengel, fury and Josh Shear, Josh Shear. Josh Shear said: My thoughts on #newtwitter (with apologies to @Jason_Smith78) [...]